Home | Chronolliegy | Antholliegy | Articles | Media | News | Contacts
|
|
Articles |
||
Admiral Halsey
|
continued | |
|
|
When an article was first suggested
about the more 'technical' side of Ollie's work I pictured the worst excesses
of 'Univibes' - the otherwise excellent Hendrix magazine. This offers
note by note analysis of improvisations (a contradiction in itself) in
a musicspeak of 'motifs', 'relative minors' and '6ths' - recalling the
'aeolian cadences' and 'pentatonic clusters' once attributed to Lennon
and McCartney. The truth in both instances, of course, is that the artistes
worked intuitively on their own terms, defying such academic appraisal.
Halsall's contributions (for which I make no apology whatsoever for placing
in the same company) are equally impossible to annotate meaningfully.
Like all virtuosi, Ollie had a total
understanding of musical theory. I have no idea whether he could read
formal notation and it is of little significance anyway. I should however
be delighted to hear of any informed opinions on this or any other 'point
of order'. I suppose, in the overall scheme of things (as perceived by
rock journalists) it is rather inconvenient that the world's finest guitar
player should be found happily playing small provincial European clubs
with an equally underrated and ageing hippy singer songwriter. It's not
'Hollywood', it debases the Rock myth and spoils an otherwise tidy story.
To begin to understand the nature of
Ollie's talent it is important to note that he played guitar the same
way as he did the piano - not literally of course! - but, essentially,
the medium made little difference. Any discussion of equipment must, therefore,
be largely superficial - as, indeed, is true with Hendrix: 'Red House',
from Jimi's first UK LP, arguably inspired more aquisitions of Fender
Stratocasters than any other single recording. Unfortunately, it transpired
that the instrument used on that occasion was apparently a Hofner. Ollie,
like Jimi, played left-handed and used standard models strung upside -
down. I have heard stories in both cases of being able to play conventionally
strung guitars with apparent ease but I am sceptical - why bother to convert
the guitar if it made no difference? Plectrums Legato Strings Guitars By 1973 Ollie had
acquired a black Fender Stratocaster (rosewood neck) as a 'spare'. This
received no more than the 'Hendrix conversion' - a straightforward 'reverse-string'
job. Fenders in general are harder to play
than Gibsons because of their longer scale, consequently increased string
tension and larger relative fret spacing. They also have single-coil pick-ups
which give an altogether different response. Fenders tend to have wider
tonal characteristics and are as different from Gibsons as are pianos
from organs (the Gibson being the organ in this crude analogy!). It's
quite easy to spot the difference. Most of Ollie's more funky laid back
performances are Fender - the more flash 100mph stuff is invariably Gibson.
Technical note: Fender Stratocaster
'treble' pick-ups are ordinarily angled towards the bridge by the top
strings. In a lefthand conversion the emphasis shifts giving the bottom
E and A a harder tone and the treble side a thicker and more mellow sound.
Also the volume control no longer gets in the way (!) facilitating 'damping'
at the bridge. In a 1979 interview Ollie described an extensive if somewhat bizarre collection of instruments including a Watkins Rapier (!) and a Gibson SG Junior. This, in sharp conrast to a few years earlier when, at a low ebb following a stint with the Glitter Band (I kid you not!) our hero had but a star-shaped monstrosity to his name. From the mid-70's Ollie used various Stratocasters (righthand conversions) and was noted, prior to a Patto reunion gig to have chopped one of the cutaway 'horns' off his guitar with a woodsaw because he felt it got in the way (Stratocasters are not symmetrical). |
During the 80's however, Ollie became
enamoured of one particular guitar - a cherry red Gibson SG Standard circa
1968. There are 3 series of this particular model and this was a Type
2 - considered inferior to the Type 1 (but not as inferior as the Type
3!). This misconception is founded on the introduction of a one-piece
'bat-wing' scratchplate/pick-up surround which doesn't present the pick-ups
exactly parallel to the strings - neither, however, do the individual
units of the Series 1 version. Very Obscure Note: Many 2 x pick-up
SGs had 'routing' for a 3rd pick-up under the large scratchplate but only
the Custom model employed the facility. Ollie's 'Standard' had 2 pick-ups and
had received the 'full works conversion' ie. including switchover of controls.
He used this guitar right up to the 1992 European tour. The original 'Vibrola'
tremelo unit was replaced around 1988 with a more stable Kahler or similar
device. I wouldn't have thought he actually used the locking nut that
goes with such a system although one certainly appears to be in place
in the WAWS (issue 2) ltd. ed. colour print. The original treble pick-up
had been replaced early on by a Di Marzio and, by 1992, both this and
the bass unit hadbeen exchanged for what appeared to be Seymour Duncan
'Hot Rails'. Needless to say, this axe needs to be looked at and preserved.
Does anyone know of its whereabouts? Effects Amplifiers Transistors were, and still are, an
anathema to most guitarists since they lack the warmth and natural harmonics
of hot valves and I am still amazed at the sound he achieved with them.
I am convinced however that he used the Fender amps at the Rainbow ACNE
concert as you can clearly hear the overdrive effect described and he
had a 100 watt Marshall (valve) 'stack' with Boxer in 1975/76. On Kevin's 1988 gigs Ollie used a Vox
AC30 and possibly a Fender Twin Reverb (both valve). All this serves simply
to reinforce the point that he could create the same unique sound however
derived. On the final 1992 tour he was back where he started with Fender,
only this time with a tiny Studio 85. The '85' refers more to the original
year of manufacture than the power which is rated at 65 watts (although
I've tried one of these and the output doesn't even appear to approach
that). These state-of-the-art units have individual 'clean' and 'overdrive'
channels - a facility pre-empted manually by Mr Halsall some 20 years
earlier! The Music Ollie's music involved many diverse
elements. Primarily perhaps (since this is what first attracted attention)
he could play very fast and was the first to discover how to do it. Forget
Van Halen, Satriani et al., no one has matched this technique. Second,
and more importantly, Halsall possessed a melodic sense which transcends
any formal analysis. The quintessential example of this
would be in his unique guitar/vocal 'duets'. This was Steve Winwood's
party-piece in the late 60's and involves scat-singing (do, do, do etc)
along with the guitar solo. Winwood did this marvellously using the basic
pentatonic (5-note) blues scale (I feel an attack of Univibes coming on!!).
Halsall, typically, took it to the ridiculous but obvious (to him) extreme
of incorporating minor 11th and 13th jazz patterns and - this is the point-
he didn't sing along with the guitar, he played along with the singing!
This is incredibly difficult to achieve and perhaps the key - the most
revealing insight to his ability since it means quite simply that he could
play anything he could sing and, when you think about it, that is just
about the ultimate form of musical expression. Check out 'Peter Abraham'
from Patto's 'Roll 'Em, Smoke 'Em' album, or 'Why Are We Sleeping' live
at Fukoyata, Japan 23/12/88. There remains little more to say and
at the same time there are volumes unwritten. I am certain Ollie will
be generally acknowledged in years to come, as is the way of these things.
Besides Hendrix, only two others stand in the same league - Richard Thompson
and Django Reinhardt. I gave up trying to emulate Halsall many years ago
but I am left with a spirit or an idea - a lateral approach which you
can sometimes latch onto on a good night, whilst not actually copying.
Ollie's secret was founded on the premise that he never listened to his
contemporaries. His influences were 1950's pop records
from his youth and some jazz saxophone and piano players. Ollie was the
most self-effacing and modest musician you could imagine - which probably
accounts for his lack of recognition. He had a wonderful sense of the
absurd and his playing reflects this, overflowing with pathos, humour
and sheer joy. What you hear is not Ollie playing the guitar, it's Ollie
himself - and I don't think you can really do any better than that. Barry Monks, April 1993 This article first appeared in the Kevin Ayers fanzine 'Why Are We Sleeping' #3 |
|
Curio: A very rare shot of Ollie from 1973 with a 2 p/u Gibson SG Standard, which was borrowed from Blossom Toes guitarist Brian Godding More details here |
||
|
The Ollie Halsall Archive ©1998
|